Sugs Lloyd Ltd — Q4 FY26 earnings call
Summary generated by AI from the official transcript Sugs Lloyd Ltd filed with BSE on 22 May 2026. Every statement cites a verbatim quote from that document — open any citation to read it. This is a record of what management said, not a recommendation. How we check these summaries
The short read
Sugs Lloyd reported revenue growth of 70% to INR300 crores for FY26 from INR176 crores, with EBITDA and PAT growing 69% and 71% respectively while margins were maintained. Management said the order book stood at around INR825 crores with an additional INR1,225 crores of tenders under evaluation, and highlighted a new INR640 crores order along with progress on fault passage indicators, SCADA and other niche products. Management also discussed receivables, credit facilities, and plans to reach INR1,000 crores of revenue by FY28.
Numbers mentioned
Revenue: INR300 crores (FY26)
p. 3
“Last year we concluded the year with INR176 crores, this year we have clocked INR300 crores, that leads to a 70% increase.”
Satyakam Basu, page 3 of the filed PDF · View the filing
EBITDA growth: 69% (FY26)
p. 3
“Our EBITDA has increased by 69%.”
Satyakam Basu, page 3 of the filed PDF · View the filing
PAT growth: 71% (FY26)
p. 3
“And PAT has also gone up by 71%.”
Satyakam Basu, page 3 of the filed PDF · View the filing
EPS growth: 37-38% (FY26)
p. 3
“And of course, the earning per share has also increased; it has increased by almost 37%, 38%.”
Satyakam Basu, page 3 of the filed PDF · View the filing
PAT: INR28 crores (FY26)
p. 5
“We have increased our bottom-line from INR16 crores to INR28 crores.”
Satyakam Basu, page 5 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Order book booked during the year: INR500 crores plus (FY26)
p. 4
“We have been able to book almost INR500 crores plus order during the course of the year”
Satyakam Basu, page 4 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Order book: INR825 crores (as of call date)
p. 4
“Our order book as of now stands around INR825 crores”
Satyakam Basu, page 4 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Debt to equity ratio: improved from 0.5 to 2 level (FY26)
p. 4
“As a result, our debt to equity ratio has improved from almost 0.5 to 2 level.”
Satyakam Basu, page 4 of the filed PDF · View the filing
FY26 revenue vs guidance: INR300 crores vs guidance of INR270 crores (FY26)
p. 5
“we have overachieved our guidance for financial year '26, delivering a turnover of INR300 crores against our stated guidance of INR270 crores”
Santosh Shah, page 5 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Total bank credit facility: INR125 crores (FY26)
p. 11
“INR125 crores was the total credit facility from banks in financial year ‘26.”
Santosh Shah, page 11 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Fund-based facility utilized: INR49 crores (FY26)
p. 11
“And against INR60 crores fund-based, the utilized was INR49 crores.”
Santosh Shah, page 11 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Creditor days: increased from 18 days to 61 days (FY26)
p. 11
“So the, our earlier creditor days which used to be 18 days, this year we have brought it to 61 days.”
Santosh Shah, page 11 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Credit rating: BBB minus from CARE
p. 12
“It is BBB minus from CARE. First time we got rated, that was the first rating for the company.”
Santosh Shah, page 12 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Power T&D order book: INR708 crores (as of call date)
p. 15
“INR708 crores is from power T&D, INR110 crores is from solar, and INR8 crores is from niche”
Santosh Shah, page 15 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Order pipeline under evaluation: INR1,225 crores (as of call date)
p. 8
“The total tenders which are at various stages of evaluation is around INR1,225 crores.”
Santosh Shah, page 8 of the filed PDF · View the filing
What management said it would do
A record of statements made on the call, in the words management used. Parakho does not forecast, endorse or assess them, and their presence here is not a view on whether they will happen.
Revenue — INR1,000 crores · FY28
stated firmly by Santosh Shah
p. 5
“Our target of INR1,000 crores revenue by financial year '28 is firmly on track.”
Santosh Shah, page 5 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Revenue — INR600 crores · FY27
stated firmly by Santosh Shah
p. 8
“Yes, it is very much achievable. We are on line.”
Santosh Shah, page 8 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Margins — FY27 and beyond
stated as an aspiration by Satyakam Basu
p. 9
“but we are very confident that we will be able to maintain at least the trend over the next year and more.”
Satyakam Basu, page 9 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Credit limit — INR300 crores to INR350 crores · by FY28
stated conditionally by Santosh Shah
p. 11
“We are for INR1,000 crores, we are making arrangements for a credit limit of around INR300 crores, INR300 crores to INR350 crores, mix of both fund-based and non-fund-based.”
Santosh Shah, page 11 of the filed PDF · View the filing
FPI revenue contribution — around 10% of total revenue · FY28
stated as an aspiration by Satyakam Basu
p. 11
“Yes correct. We intend a contribution of around 10% of the total revenue from FPIs.”
Satyakam Basu, page 11 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Compact FPI launch — Q2
stated firmly by Santosh Shah
p. 14
“Latest by Q2, we will be able to, you know, launch this FPI into the market.”
Santosh Shah, page 14 of the filed PDF · View the filing
INR600 crores order execution — INR200 crores to INR250 crores · FY27
stated firmly by Satyakam Basu
p. 12
“We should expect somewhere around INR200 crores to INR250 crores we should be able to bill in this financial year and balance will get shifted to the next year.”
Satyakam Basu, page 12 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Large ticket project win — at least one similar project · this financial year
stated conditionally by Santosh Shah
p. 7
“But yes, in this financial year, we expect similar such project, at least one similar such project in this financial year.”
Santosh Shah, page 7 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Switchgear product launch — next year
stated as an aspiration by Santosh Shah
p. 14
“So maybe next year we will be able to bring the VCBs and RMUs may take even further more time.”
Santosh Shah, page 14 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Q&A highlights
Management's answers to analyst questions, in Parakho's words rather than a transcript. Each row names who answered and carries the verbatim quote it was drawn from.
Management said the project follows standard RDSS payment terms and will not pressure margins.
Answered by Santosh Shah
Asked by Agastya Dave: What are the terms, working capital needs and margin impact of the large INR600 crore order?
p. 7
“there will not be any kind of a pressure on margins because of this project. The payment terms, it is a normal RDSS project and the payment terms are again 60% once we supply the material, we get 60% on that.”
Santosh Shah, page 7 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Management gave the current unexecuted order book and pipeline figures with an estimated 20-30% strike rate.
Answered by Santosh Shah
Asked by Nishita Shanklesha: What is the order book pipeline for power T&D and solar EPC?
p. 8
“Over and above and our strike rate somewhere goes around 20% to it stays between 20% to 30%.”
Santosh Shah, page 8 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Management attributed the dip to a one-time cost escalation from a delayed MAHAGENCO order shifted from Q3 to Q4.
Answered by Santosh Shah
Asked by Vaibhav Mishra: Why did margins dip to around 12% in the March quarter versus 14% for the half year?
p. 10
“There has been one, like one MAHAGENCO order was there, which we could not execute in because of some land dispute in Q3, which got shifted to Q4”
Santosh Shah, page 10 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Management detailed the fund-based and non-fund-based credit facility split and utilization, and rating status.
Answered by Santosh Shah
Asked by Hiral Desai: What is the current credit facility, utilization, and rating?
p. 11
“INR125 crores was the total credit facility from banks in financial year ‘26. Out of that INR125 crores, INR65 crores was non-fund and INR60 crores was fund-based.”
Santosh Shah, page 11 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Management clarified the INR640 crore order figure includes GST, while the order book is stated net of GST.
Answered by Satyakam Basu
Asked by Chenna Satyanarayana: Why does the order book figure differ from the analyst's calculation including the new order?
p. 13
“The order of INR640 crores is inclusive of 18% GST. Now what we are giving and what will get converted into revenue and all will remain without GST, that is around INR540 crores.”
Satyakam Basu, page 13 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Management named L&T and Voltas as key competitors and described the project as potentially the second largest SCADA project in India.
Answered by Santosh Shah
Asked by Jignesh: Who are the competitors for SCADA orders and what is the market potential?
p. 15
“We will be competing majorly with companies like L&T. L&T was a competitor in this project also. Then we will be competing with companies like Voltas and other major EPC players.”
Santosh Shah, page 15 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Management said they only bid on projects funded by the central government or multilateral agencies, not by state governments or DISCOMs directly.
Answered by Santosh Shah
Asked by Jignesh: Are DISCOM credit risks a concern for receivables given their financial health?
p. 16
“we are not bidding for projects which are funded by state government or DISCOMs. So, in that case, we are fully secure.”
Santosh Shah, page 16 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Risks flagged
Receivables concentration due to 40% of sales occurring in Q4
p. 6
“Now one thing I would like to bring to your focus that majority, 40% of our sales has happened in Q4.”
Santosh Shah, page 6 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Cost escalation from delayed execution due to land dispute and local political interference
p. 10
“there had been certain, you know, interference from local political, you know, fraternity and all these things. So that may have cost some kind of a extra or some escalation in our costing.”
Santosh Shah, page 10 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Uncertainty in timing of large government-funded orders due to factors outside company control
p. 7
“It is directly depends on customer to customer and government to government.”
Santosh Shah, page 7 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Health of DISCOMs limiting their ability to fund tenders independently
p. 16
“We nowadays, given the health of DISCOMs, they are not in position to float any tender which is funded by their own accruals or their own money.”
Santosh Shah, page 16 of the filed PDF · View the filing
Generated by claude-sonnet-5. Source: the transcript as filed with BSE. We link to the exchange's copy; we do not host transcripts. Parakho is a data and screening tool, not an investment adviser — nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold.